🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed seats for Māori representatives on New Zealand local authorities is set to be cut by more than half, after a controversial law change that required municipal councils to put the future of hard-won Indigenous wards to a public vote.

Background Information on Māori Wards

Māori wards, which can include multiple councillors depending on demographic data, were created in 2001 to give Māori electors the option to elect a assured Māori representative in local and regional authorities. Initially, local governments could only establish a Indigenous seat by initially putting it to a community referendum in their region. Local populations frequently spent years generating community backing and pushing their councils to establish Māori wards.

Legislative Shifts and Administrative Decisions

To remedy the issue, the previous Labour government allowed municipal authorities to establish a Indigenous seat without first requiring them to subject it to a public vote.

However, this year, the right-wing coalition government reversed the change, stating local residents ought to determine whether to establish Māori wards.

Referendum Results

The coalition’s law change required councils that had created a electoral district under Labour’s rules to conduct binding referendums concurrently with the local body elections, which ended on October 11. Of 42 councils participating in the referendum, 17 decided to retain their seats, and twenty-five to abolish theirs – showing many regions opposed to guaranteed Māori representation.

These outcomes provided “a crucial move in reinstating community self-determination.”

Opposition parties nevertheless have condemned the government’s law change as “racist” and “against Indigenous interests”. After assuming power, the current administration has implemented extensive reversals to policies designed to improve Māori health, wellbeing and representation. Officials has stated it wants to terminate “race-based” policies, and says it is dedicated to enhancing results for Indigenous people and every citizen.

Urban-Rural Divide

The results of the referendums were divided down city-country divisions – most cities mandated to hold referendums backed Indigenous seats, while rural regions skewed heavily towards removing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Māori wards that had only just come in – they’re just beginning to hit their stride.”

Electoral Participation and Concerns

The recent local government elections recorded the lowest voter turnout in over three decades, with less than a third of citizens casting a vote, prompting calls for an overhaul.

This approach had been “a mockery”.

Comparative Treatment

Local governments are permitted to create other types of electoral districts – including countryside seats – without initially mandating a public vote. The disparate requirements applied to Māori wards suggested the administration was targeting Indigenous inclusion.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Numerous localities have expressed strong opposition.”

This remark referred to the 17 regions that voted to retain their seats.